In Re City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Avenue " D "
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 11, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming a report of commissioners of estimate and assessment.
1Opinion of the Court
This proceeding was instituted on the 23rd day of December, 1904, by the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New York passing a resolution pursuant to the provisions of the Greater New York charter by which it declared "it for the public interest that the title to the lands and premises required for the opening and extending of Avenue `D' from Flatbush avenue to Rogers avenue in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York, should be acquired by the city of New York." The said board by its resolution requested the corporation counsel of the city to make application at a Special…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Mott v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of HiddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Matter of City of New York (Sedgwick Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Headley v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.