Legal Opinion
Filterite Corp. v. Tate Engineering, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 30, 1970No. Civ. No. 19366PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
This is an action for alleged infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 3,356,226, issued December 5, 1967, on an application filed on December 29, 1964 by Charles A. Miller, Jr., Joseph B. Masaschi and Robert W. Miller, Jr.
Plaintiff, Filterite Corporation (Filterite), the assignee of the patentees under an assignment dated March 20, 1968, is a Maryland corporation with its principal place of business at Timonium, Maryland, at which it is engaged in the manufacture and sale of filters and filter equipment. The original defendant, Tate Engineering, Inc.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Application of Lyle B. BorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Deering Milliken Research Corporation v. Beaunit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Filterite Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of Maryland v. Tate Engineering, Inc., and the Carborundum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1980