State v. Cascio

On Rehearing.

McCALEB, Justice.

The sole question on this appeal is whether it was reversible error for associate counsel for the prosecution to state during his closing argument to the jury “that he had worked in conjunction with the District Attorney’s Office in all phases of the case since the date of its inception and was convinced that the accused was involved in the matter”. On the original hearing, we held in the negative for three reasons — -viz.: (1) that the statement was not an expression of an opinion of guilt, (2) that, even conceding it to be improper, the error was not reviewable…