Legal Opinion

State v. Aocardo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 27, 1911No. 19,064PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville; C. K. Sell wing, Judge. Carlo Aecardo and another were convicted of grand larceny, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

The two appellants in this ease; Carlo Accardo and Giadana Cuizirma, were jointly indicted for breaking and entering a box car in the nighttime with intent to steal, which is an offense denounced by Act 47, p. 40, of 1890; and for stealing from said box car goods of a value exceeding $100, or, for grand larceny. They were tried and found guilty, and sentenced to 12 years in the penitentiary.

[1] They moved to quash the indictment on the ground that it did not set forth whether the Texas & Pacific Railroad Company, the alleged owner of the box car in question, was a corporation.

The court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  3. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. State v. PoynierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. State v. MatassaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API