Martin & Hill Cash-Carrier Co. v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of the United States for the District of .Massachusetts. This was a suit in equity by the Martin & Hill Cash-Carrier Company against Joseph C. Martin for infringement of certain patents for automatic cash-carrier systems for store service. The circuit court found that there was no infringement, and dismissed the bill. 62 Fed. 272. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
COLT, Circuit Judge.
This bill was originally brought for the infringement of three patents, Nos. 255,525, 276,441, and 284,456, granted to the defendant, Martin, for improvements in automatic cash-carrier systems for store service. These patents have been as*787signed to the plaintiff. By amendment to the bill, the two latter patents were stricken out, and the suit as it now stands is limited to the first claim of patent Mo. 255,525, which issued March 28,, 1882. In answer to the charge of' infringement, the defendant relies upon a subsequent patent, Mo. 399,150, issued to him March 5, 1889.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Ball & Socket Fastener Co. v. Ball Glove Fastening Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
- Grier v. WiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Babcock v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Eachus v. BroomallSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Leader Plow Co. v. Bridgewater Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co. v. Casco Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.