Legal Opinion
Byers v. Cummings
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 2004No. 03-158PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 Gary Byers, Timothy Byers, Gary L. Byers Trust, Timothy W. Byers Trust, and G & T Holdings, LLP, (Byers) appeal from a jury verdict from the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, finding Steven Cummings and Christensen, Moore, Cockrell, Cummings, and Axelburg, PC (Cummings), not negligent in their representation of the Byers during the sale of their company, Creative Sales and Manufacturing (CSM). We affirm. The issues presented on appeal are:
f 2 1. Whether substantial credible evidence existed to support a jury verdict of “no negligence.”
¶3 2. Whether Cummings’ change of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Ronald Kirsh in Re Paula Kirsh, Debtors. Eugene Parks Law Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Ronald Kirsh Paula KirshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Jacques v. Montana National GuardMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Carlson v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 1987
- Fillinger v. Northwestern Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Howard v. St. James Community HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Edie v. GrayMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. B. BoydMontana Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. E. RodriguezMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Heather Wylie v. BalazMontana Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.