Legal Opinion
State v. Hamm
Montana Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1991No. 90-263 and 91-022PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
A jury convicted the defendant, Timothy Allen Hamm (Hamm) of sexual intercourse without consent in the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County. Pursuant to this conviction and a prior, unrelated conviction of sexual intercourse without consent, the trial court designated and sentenced Hamm as a persistent felony offender. From this conviction and sentence Hamm appeals. We affirm.
The following issues are raised on appeal.
1. Was the evidence sufficient to support the jury’s verdict of sexual intercourse without consent?
2. Did Hamm knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KrumMontana Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SalmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Manneh Vay v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- In re ScribnerVermont Superior Court · 2004
- Napoleon Momon v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997