Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 23, 1991No. 1692PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Appellant-sellers, McMaster, Fishburne and Martin, brought this action against respondent-purchaser, Strickland, for breach of a contract to purchase certain property. From an order of the court in favor of the purchaser, the sellers appeal. We reverse and remand.

The purchaser entered into a contract of sale with the sellers on October 2, 1987 to purchase a .74 acre lot in North Myrtle Beach for $50,000. Prior to execution of the contract, the parties negotiated the terms of the contract. It was made clear during these negotiations that the purchaser intended to use the property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Guignard v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. McCall Co. v. Hobbs-Henderson Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Atlantic Title InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Truck South, Inc. v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. McMaster v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Favero Farms v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Jericho State v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API