Legal Opinion
Cowen v. Failey
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1898No. 18,035PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
This case has grown out of litigation connected with the administration of the affairs of the Order of the Iron Hall, a mutual insurance association. Supreme Sitting, etc., v. Baker, 134 Ind. 293; Schmidt v. Failey, 148 Ind. 150, 37 L. R. A. 442. The suit was brought by appellant for himself and eighteen hundred other certificate holders of the Order of the Iron Hall, residing in and near the city of Cleveland, Cuyahoga county, Ohio.
It appears that, as required by the constitution and by-laws of the order, eighty per cent, of each insurance assessment was remitted to the head office of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Buswell v. Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Combs v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Fawcett v. Supreme SittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Wilder v. KeelerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Malley v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- MacMurray v. SidwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Potts v. Continental Beneficial Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- National Park Bank v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1902