Borough of Philipsburg v. Bloom
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Doyle:
I agree with the majority opinion insofar as it resolves the counterclaim pertaining to abuse of process. I respectfully dissent, however, from that portion of the opinion which would reverse the trial court on the issue of the exclusiveness of the arbitration remedy. In this *367matter I would affirm the trial court’s order to grant the police officers’ demurrer.
The police officers contend that they have stated a cause of action under Section 1190 of the Borough Code (Code),1 53 P.S. §46190, by pleading that the Borough improperly furloughed them…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kraftician v. Borough of CarnegieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Gruver v. HowellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Minnick v. Borough of HyndmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988