Legal Opinion

Gruver v. Howell

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1977No. Appeal, 182 and 183 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

James Graver and Russell Banta (appellants) were employed as permanent full-time police officers in the Dallas Township Police Department (Department) for periods in excess of three years and two years respectively. On December 31, 1974, both were informed that for reasons of economy the Dallas Township Board of Supervisors (Board) had decided to reduce the number of police officers of the Department from eight to five and that they and another officer were being furloughed immediately. On January 6, 1975, they brought actions in equity and mandamus against the Dallas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Groff v. Borough of SellersvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Gabriel v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. GENES v. City of DuquesneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. ALMY v. Borough of WilkinsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Kraftician v. Borough of CarnegieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Borough of Canonsburg v. FloodCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Minnick v. Borough of HyndmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API