Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Stokes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit. Tbe facts appear by tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Stokes sued Jacobs for the purpose of recovering back money paid to him on an alleged illegal purchase of-liquors. Evidence was introduced to show that the parties owned the stock of groceries and liquors as partners, and that the purchase was simply the buying out by Stokes of the partnership interest of Jacobs in the entire business.

The Court below was asked to charge, that, if this was the real nature of the transaction, the plaintiff below could not recover. The Court refused this, and charged that if such were the case he could recover.

We think the Court erred in so deciding.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGunn. v. HanlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Hill v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API