Legal Opinion
Rattigan v. Ashcroft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2004-2009PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
FBI agent Wilfred Rattigan filed suit alleging discrimination based on race, national origin, and religion; retaliation; and hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e el seq. (“Title VII”). After extensive motions practice, a single retaliation claim remained. Following a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor on that retaliation claim, defendant appealed arguing that “plaintiffs claim [wa]s nonjusticiable under Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit ease law....” See Rattigan v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Martin v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sledge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Gonda v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Webster v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.