State v. Hendel
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
Appeal from a driving-while-intoxicated conviction, based in part on evidence converting a Breathalyzer reading of percentage of alcohol by volume to its equivalent percentage of alcohol by weight. Before reaching the merits we must first untangle the procedural web spun by defendant’s premature appeal taken before final judgment.
In a trial before the court without a jury the court found defendant guilty of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. (§ 564.440 1 ). The court then stated defendant’s punishment would be a fine of $300. There was neither allocution nor…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Housman v. FiddymentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. PaulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Newmark v. Liverpool & London Fire & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Lane v. KattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Tennis v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SinclairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.