Setian v. Callahan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, and without opposition, this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. The plaintiffs motion is ALLOWED, in part, and the defendant’s motion is DENIED. Judgment will enter for plaintiff, and the matter is remanded.
So Ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVERSE THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Docket No. 7) and DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Docket No. 8)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Setian v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Yankun v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Liberti v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024