Legal Opinion
Setian v. Apfel
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 23, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-30190-KPNPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVERSE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Docket No. 12) and DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Docket No. H)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The present matter is an action under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) requiring Jack Setian (“Plaintiff’) to repay an overpayment of benefits in the amount of $41,907.60. The particular issue concerns the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tefera v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Rivera Ocasio v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Dillard v. MassanariDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Nickerson v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020