Legal Opinion

State Wholesale Grocers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 25, 1957No. 56 C 418PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a private action for treble damages and injunctive relief brought under .Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act. 1 Plaintiffs are twenty retail and two ■wholesale grocers located in the Chicago Metropolitan Area who bring this action on behalf of themselves and all retail and wholesale grocers similarly situ.ated as an alleged class suit under Rule 23(a) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Defendants are 'The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (New Jersey), Woman’s Day, Inc,, General Foods Corporation, Hunt Foods, Inc., and the Morton…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. State Wholesale Grocers, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiffs v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  4. Rayco Manufacturing Company v. DunnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  5. United States v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API