Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Crisp
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 7, 1983No. 1044-82, 1045-82 and 1049-82PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING, ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ODOM, Judge.
On original submission this Court, 661 S.W.2d 954, held the caption to H.B. 730, passed as Acts 1981, 67th Leg., p. 698, ch. 268, was defective under Art. Ill, Sec. 35, Texas Constitution, which provides:
“No bill, (except general appropriation bills, which may embrace the various subjects and accounts, for and on account of which moneys are appropriated) shall contain more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act, which shall not be expressed in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Ex Parte GibauitchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- SDJ, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
- Hurwitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hurwitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.