Legal Opinion
Ӕtna Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Bank of Tacoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1932No. 6789PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORCROSS, District Judge.
Appellee brought an action against appellant to recover upon a bond, in the amount of $4,000, executed by appellant, as surety, and.American Wood Pipe Company, as principal, the bond running to appellee and/or Twin Harbors Lumber Company, as obligees. At the conclusion of appellee’s ease, appellant moved for a directed verdict, which was denied. Appellant introduced no ' evidence, and the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellee. A judgment in the sum of $4,244.36, including interest, was entered thereon, from which this appeal is prosecuted. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Pueblo Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Insurance Company v. First National Bank in St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Nieschlag & Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Mut. InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- American Surety Co. v. EganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932