Perrow v. Rixey
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Culpeper county, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendent. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
Plaintiff in error brought assumpsit against the defendant in error to recover commission upon the fol*193lowing paper: “I hereby agree to sell that portion of my ‘Richlands’ farm to the west of the fence running from the county road to Rouss’ farm to any purchaser brought tó me by B. F. Perrow, provided that said land nets me twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per acre cash and provided further that said sale is consummated within thirty days from date. This agreement made this 24th of July, 1914. John S. Rixey.”
There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, to which judgment this writ of error…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Watkins v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Cummins v. BeaversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Hanger v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- Brown v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glidewell v. Murray-Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Morris v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Barnard v. Gardner Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Hummer v. EngemanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.