Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 13, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Case 31 — Action to Recover Possession of Property and to Vacate a Judgment — APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

JUDGE HOBSON —

Reversing.

On October 10, 1900, appellee, Amelia Moore, filed before the county judge of Fleming county her affidavit stating that her mother, appellant, Sabina Taylor, “is of unsound mind, by reason of her age and! infirmity, and is incapable of managing her estate.” Thereupon the county attorney filed an information asking that an inquest be held. O. R. Bright, an attorney, was appointed to defend for appellant, and a jury was sworn, who returned the following verdict: “We, of the jury, find from the evidence that 'Sabina Taylor is, by reason of great age…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Healey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Stewart v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. In re MorganNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  4. Menifee v. EndsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  5. Armstrong v. . ShortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1820

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Banks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Martin v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Anderson's Committee v. Anderson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1914
  4. Graham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Robinson v. KierenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API