Legal Opinion

State v. Schrenker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 2004No. 5D03-2310Published

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence consisting of appellee Jerome Schrenker’s urine test results. The trial court based its suppression ruling on the authority of State v. Bodden, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2382, — So,2d -, 2002 WL 31421575 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.30, 2002), rev. granted, 853 So.2d 1071 (Fla.2003), which held that a urine test taken pursuant to Florida’s implied consent law, if not approved pursuant to the rule-making requirements of Administrative Procedures Act, is not admissible as a scientific test pursuant to the traditional rules regarding the admissibility…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BoddenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. State v. PierreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. State v. MaskerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API