Legal Opinion
State v. Bodden
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 30, 2002No. 2D01-3535PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
The State appeals the order in limine of the county court that barred the State from using as evidence, in the trial of a driving under the influence (DUI) case, the results of Anthony T. Bodden’s urine test, which was administered pursuant to the implied consent law. See § 316.1932(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). In the order, the county judge certified to this court the following *917question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160.
IN ADMINISTERING FLORIDA’S IMPLIED CONSENT LAW, IS THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT REQUIRED TO ADOPT RULES…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- WFTV, Inc. v. WilkenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Cabal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- State v. PolakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. BurnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Southwest Florida Water Management Dist. v. Charlotte Cty.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BoddenSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. MontelloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- State v. PierreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- State v. MaskerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.