Legal Opinion
Larocco v. Gardella
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 31, 2002No. FM-13-080-02CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAGH, J.S.C.
The issue presented in this matter is whether the threshold venue requirement for the Chancery Division — Family Part is satisfied by a short term dating relationship.
*236The Plaintiff brings this action in the Family Part of the Chancery Division, asserting that he formerly dated and later “resided” with the Defendant. He seeks title to personal property and reimbursement of funds which he asserts were provided to the Defendant during their relationship in contemplation of marriage. The verified complaint identifies several legal theories for his claims which include: breach of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- V.C. v. M.J.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Dunphy v. GregorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Konzelman v. KonzelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Banach v. CannonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002