Legal Opinion
Banach v. Cannon
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 24, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
812 A.2d 435 (2002)
356 N.J. Super. 342
Peter BANACH, Plaintiff,
v.
Jamie CANNON, et al., Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County.
Decided June 24, 2002.
Robert L. Witek, II, Long Branch, for plaintiff, (Resnikoff, Resnikoff & Witek, attorneys).
James W. Miskowski, Ridgewood, for defendants John and Marie Cannon.
No other appearances.
FISHER, P.J.Ch.
Plaintiff Peter Banach ("Peter") claims he fathered a child about to be born to defendant Jamie Cannon ("Jamie"). Because the constitutional rights of unwed fathers have not been viewed expansively, and prompted by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- WASTE MGMT. NJ, INC. v. Union County Utils. Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008