Legal Opinion
Eutues White v. Fred Finkbeiner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 26, 1982No. 79-1563PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to an order of the Supreme Court,1 this case is before us for the third time. The first time we considered this case we reversed the district court’s denial of petitioner-appellant Eutues White’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.2 On remand, the district court again denied habeas relief, finding that White had not requested to have counsel present during a custodial interrogation. Consequently, the district court held that the confession which White made during the interrogation was admissible under Miranda…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States of America Ex Rel. Miguel A. Espinoza v. J.W. Fairman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- David Jarrell v. Charles Balkcom, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- William R. Cody v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. George A. Scalf, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.