In re the Estate of Hatzistefanou
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Millard L. Midoxick, S.
In this pending probate proceeding the nominated fiduciary under a prior will seeks permission to file objections to probate of a later instrument.
SOPA 1410 provides that: “ one whose only financial interest [in the estate] would be in the commissions to which he would have been entitled if his appointment as fiduciary were not revoked by a later instrument shall not be entitled to file objections to the probate of such instrument unless authorized by the court for good cause shown.”
It does not appear that .“ good cause ” has as yet been defined by the courts, but it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roche v. . NasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In re the Estate of LernerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Estate of MolnarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Estate of MackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Probate of the Will of AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of PinnockNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of LachmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
- In re the Estate of PeckolickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996
- In re the Estate of MarksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
- In re the Estate of EshaghianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.