In re the Estate of Lachman
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Millard L. Midonick, S.
In this probate proceeding the parties are in the process of completing the examination of the attesting witnesses. (SCPA 1404). At the same time, three motions have been made for omnibus relief. While most of the relief relates to disclosure and would be automatic in an ordinary situation, this case involves an in terrorem clause. Moreover, movants raise a novel theory of undue influence and its application which necessitates an examination of the facts.
Decedent died on August 11, 1978 at the age of 81. He was survived by his fourth wife, Jaquine…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Will of PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re the Estate of WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Estate of WebbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
- In re the Probate of the Will of SatterleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- In re the Estate of EckertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Estate of PeckolickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996
- In re the Estate of DevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of GruppNew York Surrogate's Court · 1994
- In re the Estate of MarksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
- In re the Estate of ShearNew York Surrogate's Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.