Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Avery

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 10, 2006No. A-9031Published

1ConcurrenceCoats, Chief Judge

My colleagues decline to address the arguments that Avery raises for the first time in this court. But the State briefed these arguments and has not contested whether Avery could first raise them in his opposition to the State’s petition. The Blakely decision, by essentially throwing out many of the sentencing provisions in the prior code, has raised *964many legal issues. I think we should strive to resolve those issues as promptly as we can. The only reason to delay, that I can see, is the hope that we will be older and wiser in the future. My experience is that while the former is easy to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Donlun v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API