Legal Opinion

Allison Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided November 5, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00623Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ALLISON PEPPER PLAINTIFF v. 4:25-cv-00623-JM STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Allison Pepper began this action in state court to recover under her underinsured motorist policy (UIM) with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). State Farm removed the case on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Pending is Ms. Pepper’s motion to remand (Doc. No. 6). State Farm has responded, and Ms. Pepper filed a reply. For the reasons stated below, the motion to remand is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bell v. Hershey Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Dana R. Kopp v. Donald A. KoppCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Schubert v. Auto Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. In Re: Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company Sales Practices Litigation. Jack McCord Daniel Martin Frances Martin, Individually and as Representatives of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API