Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 30, 1954No. File No. 9418Published

1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff against his employer, The Turner and Seymour Manufacturing Company, for payment to him of certain insurance benefits alleged to be due Mm under a collective bargaining contract The plaintiff seeks also, in the alternative, similar, but not duplicate, payment from the defendant insurer, The Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as the insurance carrier.

The plaintiff is a member of the Torringtom Foundry Workers Local No. 699, also known, as No. 1699, Progressive Metalworkers Connell, Congress of Industrial Organizations, which, is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Magee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1894
  4. Degnan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API