Legal Opinion

Miles v. State ex rel. McLane

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1898No. 7609PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Richardson dounty. Tried below before Babcock, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

On May 13, 1893, the relator, Thomas McLane, was granted a license by the city of Falls City to sell malt, spirituous, and vinous liquors for the municipal year, which license was revoked and canceled by the mayor and city council on March 24, 1894. Thereupon he instituted this action for mandamus to compel the respondents to restore said license, alleging in his application as grounds therefor that relator had never been convicted of the violation of any law or ordinance, and therefore the revocation of the license was without authority and void. The respondents answered the application,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. LaflinNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Proctor v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Central Lumber Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Crooms v. KetchumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Murphy Liquor Co. v. MedberySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Krebs v. HoctorNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Langan v. Village of Wood RiverNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API