Clear Springs Water Co. v. Catasauqua Borough
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 76, Jan. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lehigh Co., June T., 1909, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of Clear Springs Water Company v. Catasauqua Borough. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Trexler, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Mestrezat,
We have carefully examined this voluminous record and the exhaustive brief of appellant’s counsel but have failed to discover any reversible error in the trial court’s findings of fact or law. We think the opinion of the learned court clearly vindicates his conclusions and the correctness of the decree which he entered.
The right of the borough, independently of the disclaimer, t’o erect its own waterworks may be eliminated from the case. The court based its conclusion entirely upon the effect of the waiver filed by the plaintiff company in the proceeding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- County of Northampton v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Bidwell v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Maust v. Pennsylvania & Maryland Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Ferson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
3Cited by7 opinions
- Strauss v. W. H. Strauss Co., Inc. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Clarendon V. F. W. Home Ass'n Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- McLean Coal Co. v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Giesey v. CoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Wilson Township v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.