Legal Opinion

Hausmann v. Sutter-Street Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1903No. S.F. No. 2814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting a new trial. The action was for personal injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff while a passenger on defendant’s street-railroad car. The verdict and judgment were for defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial upon all the statutory grounds, and it was granted,—the judge granting the motion not being the judge before whom the case had been tried. There were affidavits used on the ground of'newly discovered evidence.

It may be admitted that the ease made out by plaintiff was not a strong one, and that, if the new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cole v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Garton v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Russell v. PilgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  3. Buckingham & Hecht v. North German Fire Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1906
  4. Castor v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Unger v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API