Legal Opinion

Edmiston v. Kiersted

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Suit by Florence E. Edmiston and husband against H.W. Kiersted, R.O. Stephenson, doing business as the Economy Lumber Company, and others. From an adverse judgment, the last-named defendant appeals.

AFFIRMED. REHEARING DENIED. Suit to foreclose executory contract for the sale of real property. Lien claimed by defendant, R.O. Stephenson, for building material furnished vendee in possession and used in repairing and improving residence on said real property. From a decree of foreclosure declaring said defendant's claim subordinate to plaintiffs' interest in said property, said defendant appeals.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berry v. McAdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pool v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Neeley v. SearightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Powers v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. North Dakota Lumber Co. v. BulgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lakeview Drilling Co. v. STARKOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lorenz v. Pilsener Brewing Co. of Ore.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. TRI-CITY BUILDING CENTER, INC. v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API