Easum v. Miller
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] The primary issue in this appeal is the reliability of the differential diagnosis technique for determining general and specific causation in a general negligence action. Differential diagnosis determined that the severe illness suffered by Appellant Jeff Ea-sum (Easum) was caused by numerous electrical shocks that he received while working on his family-owned dairy. In a summary judgment ruling, the trial court determined that this particular differential diagnosis was inadmissible because it was unreliable.
[12] Easum began suffering severe illness shortly after Appellee…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Creanga v. JardalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Lance David Bean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. McMullenSuperior Court of Delaware · 2006
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. Box Creek Mineral Ltd. P'shipWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.