Legal Opinion

Easum v. Miller

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2004No. 02-242PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] The primary issue in this appeal is the reliability of the differential diagnosis technique for determining general and specific causation in a general negligence action. Differential diagnosis determined that the severe illness suffered by Appellant Jeff Ea-sum (Easum) was caused by numerous electrical shocks that he received while working on his family-owned dairy. In a summary judgment ruling, the trial court determined that this particular differential diagnosis was inadmissible because it was unreliable.

[12] Easum began suffering severe illness shortly after Appellee…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Creanga v. JardalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lance David Bean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. McMullenSuperior Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. BNSF Ry. Co. v. Box Creek Mineral Ltd. P'shipWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API