Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Southwestern Portland Cement Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1938No. 8586Published

1DissentStephens, Circuit Judge

I dissent. I agree with the majority’s statement of the general rule that “a declaration of dividend which does not create a definite, final, irrevocable and enforceable debt against the corporation in favor of the stockholders is not a fully declared dividend.” But I think that in the present case the dividends upon which tax is claimed were absolutely and unqualifiedly declared prior to the date of the enactment of the statute, and that consequently their receipt was not subject to the tax.

The resolution of March 10, 1932 was clumsily phrased, but its intent is not different than if it had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  2. United States v. Southwestern R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Alabama Pipe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  4. Crocker v. CarneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API