Legal Opinion

Alabama Pipe Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 1, 1937No. 42981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to recover $1,297.32 paid as a tax on dividends pursuant to the provisions of section 213(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195, 206), enacted June 16, 1933, and reading as follows :

“Sec. 213. (a) There is hereby imposed upon the receipt of dividends (required to be included in the gross income of the recipient under the provisions of the Revenue *176Act of 1932) by any person other than a domestic corporation, an excise tax equal to 5 per centum of the amount thereof, such tax to be deducted and withheld from such dividends by the payor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maloney v. Western Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  3. A. T. Jergins Trust v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  4. United States v. Southwestern Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API