Legal Opinion
Alabama Pipe Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 1, 1937No. 42981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHALEY, Judge.
The plaintiff seeks to recover $1,297.32 paid as a tax on dividends pursuant to the provisions of section 213(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195, 206), enacted June 16, 1933, and reading as follows :
“Sec. 213. (a) There is hereby imposed upon the receipt of dividends (required to be included in the gross income of the recipient under the provisions of the Revenue *176Act of 1932) by any person other than a domestic corporation, an excise tax equal to 5 per centum of the amount thereof, such tax to be deducted and withheld from such dividends by the payor…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maloney v. Western Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- A. T. Jergins Trust v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- United States v. Southwestern Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938