Legal Opinion
Zurich Insurance v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 27, 1986No. 85—112, 85—129, 85—131 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY
delivered the opinion of the court:
In these three consolidated interlocutory appeals, three excess insurers of Raymark Industries, Inc., challenge the trial court’s decision to join them as necessary parties in a declaratory judgment action. Review has been granted pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308).
Raymark Industries, Inc., formerly Rabestos-Manhatten, Inc., has been named as a defendant in thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals alleging they sustained injuries because they were exposed to asbestos-containing products that it manufactured.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. McDanielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Zurich Insurance v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Bezin v. GinsburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- National Bank of Albany Park v. S.N.H., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Carson v. MateykaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zurich Insurance v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Society of Mount Carmel v. National Ben Franklin InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Mt. Carmel Soc. v. NAT. BEN FRANK. INS.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Holzer v. Motorola Lighting, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Allied American Insurance v. AyalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.