Legal Opinion
Spurlock v. Cycmanick
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 20, 1991No. 91-29PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
584 So.2d 1015 (1991)
Anthony SPURLOCK, Petitioner,
v.
The Honorable Michael F. CYCMANICK, Circuit Court Judge, Etc., Respondent.
No. 91-29.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 20, 1991.
Rehearing Denied September 12, 1991.
Joseph DuRocher, Public Defender, and William C. Hancock, II, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
DIAMANTIS, Judge.
The petitioner, Anthony Spurlock, pursuant to rule 9.030(b)(3) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, has…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Davidson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Nesworthy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Janos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Kennedy v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993