Legal Opinion

Schelmety v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2016No. 50,586-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Chief Judge.

JjThis is a tort case seeking damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff, Danielle Schelmety, while riding in a Rhino “side by side” four-wheel off-road vehicle driven by defendant, James Johnson. The instant appeal by both Danielle and James is from a summary judgment dismissing with prejudice Danielle’s claim against defendants, Safeco Insurance of America and Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon (“Safeco”), the homeowners’ and umbrella insurers of the Rhino owner, Dr. William Smith, and his son, Michael.1 Finding no error, however, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. Cutsinger v. RedfernSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. Elliott v. Continental Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chreene v. Howard C. Prince, Jr. & Rowdy Adventures, L. L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Lewis v. GEICO Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance v. CleaverDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  4. Jeffrey Farshad v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. Judy Maxie v. Annie Bates, Marlos Bates & Foremost Insurance GroupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API