Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Herbert Edmundo Gomez-Vigil and Silvia Auxiladora Hernandez De Gomez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1993No. 91-70004Published

1ConcurrenceAldisert, Circuit Judge

I join in the panel’s opinion only because I am obligated to follow the panel opinion in Castillo-Villagra v. INS, 972 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir.1992).

I write separately to make clear that I believe that the Due Process question in Castillo-Villagra is one of exceptional importance and that the panel’s decision is in tension with or squarely conflicts with decisions of eight other courts of appeals, representing every other court that has considered this issue. I believe that, as a matter of procedure, the decision runs counter to the Federal Rules of Evidence and that, as a matter of constitutional…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API