Legal Opinion
City of Hidalgo v. Prado
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 24, 1999No. 13-98-596-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice HINOJOSA.
Appellees, Francisco Prado, Adan Gomez, Manuel Martinez, and Noel Borrego, are former City of Hidalgo police officers. They each sued appellants, the City of Hidalgo and Chief of Police Ruben De Leon, for wrongful termination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court denied appellants’ motions for summary judgment which were based on a claim of official immunity. 1 Appellants each raise two issues challenging the denial. We reverse and render.
A. The Allegations
1. Francisco Prado
Francisco Prado began working as a police officer for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Houston v. KilburnTexas Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vela v. Rocha, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Eastland County Cooperative Dispatch v. Poyner, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002
- Cameron County v. Carrillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Dovalina v. Nuno, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- the Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves v. E. L. O'Rourke, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.