Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Naylor

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

This action was brought to recover $2,600 and interest on a promissory note, dated August 24, 1931, payable six months after its date to the order of Associated Property Holders, Inc., and delivered by the latter to plaintiff on September 18, 1931. The evidence which was admitted on the trial established the following facts without any material conflict: Defendant was a stockholder of the Associated Property Holders, Inc., which in August, 1931, was indebted to plaintiff on its collaterized note, in which it had agreed to deliver to plaintiff additional securities or make payments on account…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Campbell v. Fourth Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. McLaughlin-Gormley-King Co. v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Prahl v. BoehmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Badger Machinery Co. v. United States Bank & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Banking Commission v. TownsendWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cremer v. Banking CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API