Legal Opinion

AUSTIN v. HASHIM

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01955Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW B. AUSTIN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 21-1955 PAUL HASHIM & U.S. CLAIMS SERVICES, INC., Defendants. PAPPERT, J. September 3, 2021 MEMORANDUM Last year, Andrew Austin represented Dominick DeSimone in a putative class action against U.S. Claims Services and its employee Paul Hashim. (Am. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF 4.) The Court dismissed DeSimone’s amended complaint and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. (Id. at ¶¶ 59, 83); see DeSimone v. U.S. Claims Servs., Inc., No. 20-2133,

2021 WL 1662779

(3d Cir. Apr. 28,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API