Legal Opinion
Use Techno Corp. v. Kenko USA, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 4, 2007No. C-06-02754 EDLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
On April 24, 2006, Plaintiffs Use Techno Corporation and Futoshi Matsuyama (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this patent infringement case against Defendants Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc., Jarrow Formulas, Inc., Jarrow Industries, Inc., Ken-ko USA, Inc., Soft-Gel Technologies, Inc., Chemco Industries, Inc., Ronald Udell and Siva Hari (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants infringed Plaintiffs’ United States Patents Nos. 6,485,760 (“the '760 patent”) and 6,716,459 (“the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.