Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gehelo v. Gehelo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1953No. 33372Published

1DissentHart, J.

In this case, the question involved has to do with the subject and doctrine of the comity of courts of concurrent and coextensive jurisdiction of the same subject matter. It does not relate to any controversy as to whether the judgment of one court is a bar per se to the jurisdiction of another court to render a like judgment.

It is a fundamental rule that, as between courts of concurrent and coextensive jurisdiction, the one whose jurisdiction is first invoked by the filing of a petition and the issuance of summons or its equivalent, followed by the completion of service, acquires the power…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Rosenblatt v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Rorick v. Devon Syndicate, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Alpert v. Mercury Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API