Legal Opinion

Davis v. Laurenzi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1978No. 123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the lower court erred in granting appellee judgment on the pleadings for specific performance of an agreement of sale of real estate because the pleadings raised a disputed issue of material fact. We agree and therefore reverse and remand the case for a trial of these issues.

The complaint and accompanying documentation of the appellee-buyer, Hortense Davis, alleged the following facts. Appellants-sellers, Edward and Regina Laurenzi, husband and wife, signed an agreement of sale with appellee on February 28, 1977 for certain real estate situated at 2939…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Cohn v. Weiss Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. DiPompeo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Wood v. Collingdale BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gray v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API