Legal Opinion

Gray v. Gray

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1996No. 00135PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Appellee, Shirley Gray, instituted this action for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of land against her mother-in-law, Alice Gray, on June 25, 1993. Alice Gray, appellant, contends that the equity court’s decision awarding specific performance of the contract was erroneous in a number of respects. We affirm.

The important facts in this case are not in dispute. They largely are resolved by the contract entered by the parties and admissions contained in appellant’s deposition. Appellee was married to appellant’s son, Larrison, who died in January, 1993.

On December…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Cohn v. Weiss Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Garcia v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Widmer Engineering, Inc. v. DufallaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. International Diamond Importers, Ltd. v. Singularity Clark, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. True Railroad Associates, L.P. v. Ames True Temper, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. In Re WolfeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API