Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Crowther

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 23, 2018No. 17-P-29Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Attorney General brought an action on behalf of the Commonwealth pursuant to G. L. c. 93A, § 4, alleging that the defendants engaged in deceptive business practices against purchasers of surplus lines insurance. The Commonwealth contended that, for years, the defendants charged their clients hidden agency fees by altering or withholding legal documents. Following a twenty-two day jury-waived trial, a judge of the Superior Court determined that defendant Andrew Crowther's active concealment of agency fees was a deceptive practice in violation of c. 93A. However, the judge found codefendant…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. DomanskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API